3D fracture mechanics analysis
3D fracture mechanics analysis
Zencrack provides a general 3D fracture mechanics analysis capability. But what is meant by "3D" in the context of a fracture mechanics or crack growth simulation? The term is widely used - sometimes in a misleading way. Are you sure that your 3D analysis methodology is really providing a 3D solution?
3D structural model
For finite element or boundary element analysis it is immediately obvious by visual inspection whether or not the structural model is 2D or 3D. However, a 3D model does not necessarily mean a 3D analysis. For example, boundary conditions may constrain the model to behave in a 2D fashion. In most cases Zencrack would be used to analyse a true 3D structural model. However, the application of appropriate boundary conditions allows Zencrack to be used to analyse axi-symmetric and 2D problems.
3D crack front
A 3D crack front is, in general, an arbitrary line in space. For a true 3D crack front capability, the crack must be able to develop into an arbitrary line if that is what the geometry, applied loading and materials data deliver. A subset of the general 3D crack is a crack in a 2D plane that may be modelled in a 3D structural model e.g. a planar semi-elliptic surface crack. There are many applications in which the analysis of this type of 2D planar defect can only be completed successfully via a 3D structural model.
3D state of stress along the crack front
Any textbook on fracture mechanics will very quickly introduce plane stress or plane strain conditions in theoretical derivations. The true state of stress varies along the length of a crack front and at any point can be plane stress, plane strain or something in between. Many factors influence this condition including surface proximity, geometry and loading.
Zencrack prefers to use an energy based approach in which the state of stress is embodied in the structural solution provided by the finite element analysis. In some cases it is necessary to make assumptions about the state of stress (for example when converting displacements to stress intensity factors) and options are available to give flexibility to the user for these cases.
3D crack growth
3D crack growth could be considered to mean several things:
Only the third description provides a full 3D capability.
In many applications, particularly forensic studies and leak-before-break, the trajectory of the crack is a critical outcome of the analysis which simply cannot be calculated with anything less than a full 3D solution.
Crack shape development with proper account of load spectrum cycles and crack growth data
A general 3D crack growth capability requires a "consistent dN" approach during fatigue crack growth integration. A general 3D crack in a finite element model has many nodes along the crack front. All of these crack front nodes must grow by the same number of cycles over an integration step. In general each node would have a different da over this step. This integration must be done as the analysis progresses in order that any change in crack shape due to non-uniform growth is properly taken into account. For a true 3D analysis it is not sufficient to attempt a pseudo-growth analysis to generate K vs a curves and then to apply integration as a secondary procedure to calculate life.